Man, I lost my case money. What does that mean you didn't "have it"? Frankly, I think the 'Aces over Kings' is just the naive imagination of a movie script writer. They were playing cards and I read his hand blind. That Nassau defense attorney's game? Rolled up aces over kings college. That would make it more desirable to have Ks on the board (in Hold'Em) than 6s. MIKE: Fuck it, let's go. Worm: We might have a shot at this if we sat down and did our thing.
You won't feel a thing. Bakes Brewing Company. I've thrown one or two barbs at you recently (latest being about RM) and directly afterwards you seem to disappear for days. Binghamton's five hours each way.
Mike McDermott: [after walking up to the poker table and putting his money on the table in the poker room inside The Mirage casino at Atlantic City, referring to that all the "rounders" at this table that regularly play at The Chesterfield club in New York City] this is beautiful, welcome to the "Chesterfield South. That was a nifty trick the other night. Teddy KGB: You sure? And then I gotta go to fuckin' Queens. Digital Greens - Other Half Brewing Co. Like they teach you in One-L... caveat emptor, pal. Mike McDermott: I was "waiting" the guy out, eventually he was going to bluff at the wrong pot, then I was going to take it.
They're simply overmatched. Lead counsel for plaintiff, Mr. McDermott, please proceed with oral arguments now. Um, so now it's on me. If you want to see this seventh card you're. Stay in the private sector. Chips Rattling] I bet it all. Worm: First of all I wasn't "printing" I was "distributing" its different, second of all I'm never going back there, stop worrying so much. Rounders (1998) - Quotes. We're not playing together, but then again, we're not playing against each other either. Well, then I'm rooting for you, Mike. I thought, maybe, you know, the boys upstate brought about a few changes in you. Mike McDermott: I'm so sorry I'm late. But in honor of Mike's alley-like return to the ring, I'll sit with you all for a while. What the hell you sittin' there for?
I don't bet with jobs like that. Little unconscious gestures that reveal the cards in their hands. Grand, and the juice is still runnin'. What am I gonna do for eight hours? But now you're here.
I over kings is just a badass hand to show. Todd Bittner is drinking a Digital Greens by Other Half Brewing Co. at Bittner Speakeasy. Aces full of kings. That's just fine by me. Says he likes to play cards. Mike McDermott: [while playing at the golf pro game, referring to increasing the size of the pot] let's get some in there. Mike McDermott: [Narrating while playing with other rounders against tourists, conventioneers, and other players in the poker room at The Mirage in Atlantic City] these two have no idea what they're about to walk into, down here to have a good time they figure, "why not give poker a try? Hold on there a fucking second.
It's a berry patch right outside New York City... prime pickings. Mike McDermott: You still got time, go back in there and lose their money back to them, and make it look good. You sure this is wise, Abe? Protect it when you don't. Vitter: Seven of hearts State Trooper: [to Mike and Worm] You boys working? Worm: [Ozzie turns mike's cards over] hey, three of a kind you've Ozzie three sixes like... Vitter: SHUT UP. Professor Petrovsky: I understand, what will it take to be free of this? I'm in the worst kind, with the worst guy. Bell Rings] Not many guys would stand up for a friend like that.
It's gonna blow your mind, blow your mind. Professor Petrovsky: I amerced myself fully, I studied everything I could about the law I felt deeply inside that it was what I was born to do. I couldn't find a cab. Mike McDermott: Why do you think the same five guys make it to the final table of the World Series of Poker EVERY YEAR? I'm gonna raise you. They took every fucking nickel. Mike McDermott: [narrating during the college fraternity game] Worm and I into our old rhythm like Clyde Frazier and Pearl Monroe, we "bring out" all the "old school" tricks, stuff we'd never play in the city, signaling, chip placing, trapping, we even use the old "best hand" play, I can probably crack the game just as quickly "straight up", but there's no risk in this room. When I win, are you gonna pay me back with my own fucking money? You always think you can beat the game straight up. You know I'll help you, man. Go to Swan Meadow, play in the golf pro game.
"We can't run from who we are, our destiny chooses us. Um, well... Kelly: [interrupts him by standing up to continue the oral arguments] Mr. McDermott has been unreachable so I'll take over, if it pleases the court. The first two thousand you owe the Chesterfield. Yeah, right over there in that cap. Mike McDermott: [after have been caught base dealing, beaten up, and thrown out at the sheriffs game] What the fuck were you thinking? Now I know what real work is. Teddy KGB: [checking his turn, slow playing his hand] To the bettor. Each player is dealt two cards face down. All right, your plus I have another to raise you. 'Cause walking in here, I can hardly remember how I built my bankroll, but I can't stop thinking of how I lost it. Mike Narrating] People insist on calling it luck.
In this chapter, Graff and Birkenstein discuss the importance of grasping what the author is trying to argue. However, the discussion is interminable. In fact, the discussion had already begun long before any of them got there, so that no one present is qualified to retrace for you all the steps that had gone before. Keep in mind that you will also be using quotes. When the "They Say" is unstated. Reading particularly challenging texts. Who are the stakeholders in the Zinczenko article? Is he disagreeing or agreeing with the issue? They mention how many times in a classroom discussion, students do not mention any of the other students' arguments that were made before in the discussion, but instead bring up a totally new argument, which results in the discussion not to move forward anymore. They say i say sparknotes chapter 4. Instead, Graff and Birkenstein explain that if a student wants to read the author's text critically, they must read the text from multiple perspectives, connecting the different arguments, so that they can reconstruct the main argument the author is making.
Deciphering the conversation. Now we will assume a different voice in the issue. Sometimes it is difficult to understand the conversation writers are responding to because the language and ideas are challenging or new to you.
What's Motivating This Writer? Careful you do not write a list summary or "closest cliche". They explain that the key to being active in a conversation is to take the other students' ideas and connecting them to one's own viewpoint. Writing things out is one way we can begin to understand complex ideas.
Multivocal Arguments. What does assuming different voices help us with in regards to an issue? We will be working with this today moving into beginning our essays. Someone answers; you answer him; another comes to your defense; another aligns himself against you, to either the embarrassment or gratification of your opponent, depending upon the quality of your ally's assistance. When you arrive, others have long preceded you, and they are engaged in a heated discussion, a discussion too heated for them to pause and tell you exactly what it is about. The book treats summary and paraphrase similarly. They say i say sparknotes chapter 8. We will discuss this briefly. If we understand that good academic writing is responding to something or someone, we can read texts as a response to something. Chapter 2 explains how to write an extended summary. This enables the discussion to become more coherent. A gap in the research. The conversation can be quite large and complex and understanding it can be a challenge. In this chapter, Graff and Birkenstein talk about the importance of taking other people's points and connecting them to your own argument. When the conversation is not clearly stated, it is up to you to figure out what is motivating the text.
What other arguments is he responding to? A great way to explore an issue is to assume the voice of different stakeholders within an issue. Burke's "Unending Conversation" Metaphor. When this happens, we can write a summary of the ideas.
When you read a text, imagine that the author is responding to other authors. This problem primarily arises when a student looks at the text from one perspective only. You listen for a while, until you decide that you have caught the tenor of the argument; then you put in your oar. Some writers assume that their readers are familiar with the views they are including. Class They Say Summary and Zinczenko –. Write briefly from this perspective. What I found helpful in this chapter were the templates that explain how to elaborate on an argument mentioned before in the class with my own argument, and how to successfully change the topic without making it seem like my point was made out of context. Chapter 14 suggests that when you are reading for understanding, you should read for the conversation.
And you do depart, with the discussion still vigorously in progress. The hour grows late, you must depart. Figure out what views the author is responding to and what the author's own argument is. What are current issues where this approach would help us? Kenneth Burke writes: Imagine that you enter a parlor. Summarize the conversation as you see it or the concepts as you understand them.