Pros:Convenient to the Metro North, and therefore a nice cheaper alternative to renting a car in Manhattan. La Guardia Airport: 32 miles. View all Industry Expertise. Cons:Bad customer service. Contact us to learn more about getting your tenant into their plug and play prebuilt faster and hassle free. Additional rates available. Address: 1 Station Plaza, Stamford, CT, Connecticut, 06902, United States. 1 station place stamford ct menu. Cons:Nothing really, all good things.
Pros:Checking in was great. Phone: 203 539 8000. The suite also offers exposed ceilings, polished concrete floor in pantry, and wood accent walls. Cons:I was 37 minute late and they tried to charge me $109 in late fees. Showing 25 of 184 Results - Page 1 of 8. Make an appointment. Down the street from the Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles.
Finishes include glass fronted offices and conference rooms, extensive millwork, and a state-of-the art pantry. Plus, you can always find plenty of discounts year-round. We help our clients change the world, one leadership team at a time®. Available to CompStak members and customers. Hours: Mon-Fri: 6am – 12am (garage attendant). Pros:Ease of doing business. Sustainability at Metro Center. Build #: Revision #: Build Date: Two main variable speed drive fans. Apartments for rent near Stamford Station - Stamford CT. 900 Westover Road, Stamford, CT 06902. Cons:When I picked up the car, I informed staff that we might be late this day and the person at the desk said that we can keep the return date FOR NOW.
Metro Center, 4th Floor. Metro Center is an eight-story, 286, 160-rentable-square-foot, multi-tenanted office building, located at I-95's exit 7, at the Stamford Transportation Center. Marketing, Sales & Strategy Officers. Before starting CompStak, Michael led the NY metro data center practice for Grubb & Ellis, where he was named National Rookie of the Year and inducted into Real Estate New York's 30 Under 30. Agile Leader Potential. You must save a search in order to receive alerts. Operations Consultants. This was extremely frustrating and the fact that it was avoidable given proper signage or instruction, made it downright maddening. New York Public Library. Cards to your digital wallet to easily access your accounts at a Wells Fargo ATM displaying the contactless symbol. Chief Executive Acceleration. Station house stamford new road. THANKSGIVING DY November 23 closed. Secured structured parking garage within the building with 2. Banking locations with a notary service available.
We the People: The Economic Origins of the Constitution. In the American system, political and economic competition are co-dependent. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, (2002, in press). The "particularity" with which the defendant must satisfy this balancing test contemplates some explanation by the defendant as to what information he/she expects the media material to contain. 2d at 714-18; Nat'l Talent Assocs., Inc., 1997 WL 829176, at *1; Smith, 2011 WL 2115841, at *4.
810 F. 2d 580, 586 (6th Cir. Pinkard v. Johnson, 118 F. 517 (M. Ala. 1987). Wood maintains the Constitution was founded on these larger sociological and ideological forces, which are the primary interests of the book. In fact, Hamilton had probably saved the economy from ruin. In Hudok, 389 S. 2d at 192, the West Virginia Supreme Court explained the balancing test as follows: "Courts have been more reluctant to enforce subpoenas against reporters in civil or administrative proceedings. See, especially, the introduction, contained in volume one, which gives valuable coherence to Anti-Federalist thought.
These experiences may blind us to the advantages of competition. They voted to ratify only if the benefits they expected from adoption of the set of rules embodied in the Constitution exceeded the costs they expected to result from that set of rules. The votes of the founders on selected issues at the Philadelphia convention and the votes during ratification are statistically related to measures of the founders and their constituents' interests. A concise presentation of the economic history of early America from the colonial period through the early national period by two eminent economic historians of early America. Competition is nowhere mentioned in the Constitution or the Declaration of Independence. More recently, in Reinstein, the court balanced the requesting party's need against the reporter's privilege and concluded that the requestor had failed to satisfy his burden. Others question an economic interpretation because they question whether political principles, philosophies, and beliefs can be ignored in an attempt to understand the design of the Constitution. There, the court applied the three-part test usually reserved only for non-confidential information, stressing that "under some extreme circumstances, rules of evidence must be subordinated to a defendant's due process right to a fair trial. Judicial evaluation of what constitutes a compelling need "involves a weighing of competing interests and a determination of relevancy. " They have great powers, such as the right to approve the appointment of ambassadors and treaties recommended by the president. See Farr v. Pitchess, 522 F. 2d 464, 468–69 (9th Cir. See Davis v. City of Springfield, No. As with the findings for financial securities holdings, this does not mean that all slaveholding delegates or all delegates from slave areas voted together at the various constitutional conventions.
Thus, it has left open the possibility for a judicial balancing of interests in those circumstances. Buchanan and Tullock maintain that it is in the self-interest of rational citizens to adopt a constitution that contains economically "efficient" rules that promote the interests of the society as a whole rather than the interests of any particular group. Washington's case law has not yet squarely addressed this issue. And to the extent that the courts take the dormant commerce clause seriously, the constitutional scheme is not, ultimately, a failure at all. Hamilton had helped to ensure the Constitution's ratification. But they can also be understood in economic terms — ensuring that political doctrines, religious faiths, news, and information of all kinds are competitively supplied with no official barriers to entry. Such a council would take the place of the Senate in advising the president on appointments and treaties, and the head of the council would take the place of the vice president. The two political branches follow a formal division of labor: Congress writes the laws, the president executes them. The system requires continuous cooperation in both the design and execution of policy — cooperation that can be given or withheld according to each partner's interests and ambitions. The fruits of these arrangements are among the highest accomplishments of our civilization. The courts have struck down some of these restrictions as unconstitutional but have upheld others, and there is no doubt that Congress will keep pushing the boundaries. Were the economic, financial, and other interests of the founders significant factors in their support for the Constitution, or their support for specific clauses in it, or their support for ratification?
Co., 195 F. 39 (N. Fla. 1998) (moving party must show that "he would be unable to succeed on his claims without [the reporter's] testimony"). Lentz v. City of Cleveland, 410 F. 2d 673 (N. Ohio 2006); Hade v. City of Fremont, 233 F. 2d 884 (N. Ohio 2002). The Fifth Circuit has rejected a balancing of interests when determining whether to quash a subpoena for non-confidential materials sought in grand jury proceedings or criminal cases. The founders thus were able to suspend their self-interests during the framing of the Constitution and promote instead the "rights of citizens and the permanent interests of the community. " It concluded that, in the absence of some compelling concern, the reporter's interest in protecting her work product outweighed any other interests. Were these activities to be more widely permitted in the private sector, the results would surely benefit public health — and improve FDA regulation as well. The Statistical Approach versus the Traditional Approach. In United States v. Bingham, for example, the court balanced the defendant's need for the material against the reporter's interest in protecting his source. Indicates how the Constitution would have been different had different interests been present at Philadelphia and how ratification would have been different had different interests been represented at the ratifying conventions.
The economic model indicates that a founder weighed the benefits (the satisfaction) and the costs (the sacrifice) to himself of his actions, making those choices that were in his self-interest, broadly defined to include any pecuniary and non-pecuniary benefits and costs of his choices. The war had been funded largely by the issue of bonds, most of which went unpaid at war's end. When the first cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (known as SARS) appeared in the Guangdong province of China in 2002, several months passed before the government notified World Health Organization officials, by which time the pandemic had already killed many in China and was spreading to other nations. Doctrinal Approach: follow precedent. Some may have difficulty because an economic approach to the adoption of the Constitution appears "too calculating. " In Taylor v. Miskovsky, the court said the Oklahoma legislature was "within" First Amendment limits (described in Branzburg) in crafting the privilege statute. A compelling need exists only if non-production "will result in a miscarriage of justice or substantially prejudice a party's ability to present its case. " The court, faced with a claim of privilege, must consider the following factors: (1) whether the materials sought are material and relevant to the action, (2) whether they are critical to a fair determination of the cause, and (3) whether the subpoenaing party had exhausted all other sources for the same information. At 217-18; Transcript of January 22, 2016 Hearing at 35:2-6, In re: Molycorp, Inc., No.
The Making of the Constitution. Personal and Constituent Interests. In re Grand Jury Subpoena American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 947 1314, 1320 (E. 1996) (quoting United States v. Enterprises Inc., 498 U. There is, of course, competition for power in every political system: In a monarchy or dictatorship, one competes for the allegiance of rulers and elites. The roots of this development go back to the emergence of regulatory agencies in the Progressive Era and their proliferation during the New Deal and the 1970s. The privilege statute strikes the balance by requiring the party seeking the information to meet the requirements of the statute clearly and convincingly. Based on large amounts of new data on the economic, financial, and other interests of the Founding Fathers, an economic model of their voting behavior, and formal statistical analysis.
However, the modern evidence does indicate that fewer economic and financial interests mattered for the basic design of the Constitution than for specific-interest aspects of it. The arrangements are similar to those of the "government-sponsored enterprises" Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac before they collapsed into federal conservatorship in 2008. Delegates who were from the more commercial areas were significantly more likely to have voted for clauses in the Constitution that strengthened the central government and were significantly more likely to have voted for ratification in the ratifying conventions. You also will examine Benjamin Franklin's statement in defense of the Constitution. Contends, however, that the founders were essentially "like-minded gentlemen" whose interests and political ideologies were similar. Therefore, especially in personal life, competition often presents itself as a constraint on our aspirations and sometimes delivers bitter disappointments — when we don't get the girl or boy, or the job, or the desired college-admission letter. Business firms vying for customers are eager for feedback about the appeal of their products; this helps them to think objectively about the value of what they have to offer, because offerings with less appeal lose out to those with more.